Comments on: Some water sport http://www.photonovice.net/2007/04/22/some-water-sport/ Photography, pictures, tools & techniques Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:13:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: mma http://www.photonovice.net/2007/04/22/some-water-sport/comment-page-1/#comment-1139 mma Sun, 20 Jul 2008 21:25:13 +0000 http://photonovice.net/?p=74#comment-1139 I find this blog very interesting, i will be here everyday till now. Greetings I find this blog very interesting, i will be here everyday till now. Greetings

]]> By: iphone games music http://www.photonovice.net/2007/04/22/some-water-sport/comment-page-1/#comment-1136 iphone games music Sat, 19 Jul 2008 12:10:16 +0000 http://photonovice.net/?p=74#comment-1136 Nice blog, i have added it to my favourites, greetings Nice blog, i have added it to my favourites, greetings

]]> By: photonovice http://www.photonovice.net/2007/04/22/some-water-sport/comment-page-1/#comment-50 photonovice Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:33:16 +0000 http://photonovice.net/?p=74#comment-50 Thanks for your comment, Razzbuffnik. Your opinion might save me more than a thousand bucks. :-) Thanks for your comment, Razzbuffnik. Your opinion might save me more than a thousand bucks. :-)

]]> By: razzbuffnik http://www.photonovice.net/2007/04/22/some-water-sport/comment-page-1/#comment-49 razzbuffnik Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:57:08 +0000 http://photonovice.net/?p=74#comment-49 The picture is fine. A bit of distance puts the subject into context. Longer lenes sometimes isolate the subject too much from the background (due to less depth of field). Believe it or not, longer lenses aren't always the answer. Longer lenses = smaller maximum apertures = slower shutter speeds = blurry pictures. I owned a 300mm lens for years and I hardly ever used it. It was impossible to hand-hold and get sharp photos that blew up well. The 135mm lens you are using is a very versatile lens. It's great for candid people photography on the street. It's fairly small and lightweight with a reasonable maximum aperture. The picture is fine. A bit of distance puts the subject into context. Longer lenes sometimes isolate the subject too much from the background (due to less depth of field).

Believe it or not, longer lenses aren’t always the answer. Longer lenses = smaller maximum apertures = slower shutter speeds = blurry pictures. I owned a 300mm lens for years and I hardly ever used it. It was impossible to hand-hold and get sharp photos that blew up well.

The 135mm lens you are using is a very versatile lens. It’s great for candid people photography on the street. It’s fairly small and lightweight with a reasonable maximum aperture.

]]>