<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adobe Photoshop Lightroom vs. Nikon Capture NX - part III</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photonovice.net/2007/05/02/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-vs-nikon-capture-nx-enhancements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photonovice.net/2007/05/02/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-vs-nikon-capture-nx-enhancements/</link>
	<description>Photography, pictures, tools &#038; techniques</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://www.photonovice.net/2007/05/02/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-vs-nikon-capture-nx-enhancements/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonovice.net/?p=106#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>Good review! 

With regards to the edit list, I much prefer the data embedded with the file. No data to lose as long as you have the photo file itself, and flexibility organizing your folders as you please, ease of backup etc. Also, since NEF is Nikon's format, I'd say Adobe is behind the 8 ball and needs to catch up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review! </p>
<p>With regards to the edit list, I much prefer the data embedded with the file. No data to lose as long as you have the photo file itself, and flexibility organizing your folders as you please, ease of backup etc. Also, since NEF is Nikon&#8217;s format, I&#8217;d say Adobe is behind the 8 ball and needs to catch up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog à la Barold &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Going against the market&#8230; again</title>
		<link>http://www.photonovice.net/2007/05/02/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-vs-nikon-capture-nx-enhancements/#comment-1100</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog à la Barold &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Going against the market&#8230; again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 11:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonovice.net/?p=106#comment-1100</guid>
		<description>[...] in edumacating myself on the subject, I&#8217;ve stumbled on the this link: Lightroom vs Capture which provides a great comparison and a run through of the main uses you would work with. My [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in edumacating myself on the subject, I&#8217;ve stumbled on the this link: Lightroom vs Capture which provides a great comparison and a run through of the main uses you would work with. My [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angelo</title>
		<link>http://www.photonovice.net/2007/05/02/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-vs-nikon-capture-nx-enhancements/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonovice.net/?p=106#comment-281</guid>
		<description>Very interesting comparison. Thanks.  I would have liked to see a comparison of the PRINTING FUNCTIONS for both programs as well.  

On this subject, I have tried both programs and I am pleasingly suprised at the printing functions in Lightroom.  I have used Photoshop (7 and then CS2) until now for my printing, but, should I buy Lightroom, I would not have any doubts on which program I would use.

Finally, re. the "zone" adjustments, I feel that I would still prefer Photoshop to Capture.  I would use Lightroom for my "standard" (i.e. not requiring Lazo type tools) adjustments and conversion from RAW and, for the few cases where I would require "zone" adjustments, revert to Photoshop, whose functionalities in this department are miles ahead of Capture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting comparison. Thanks.  I would have liked to see a comparison of the PRINTING FUNCTIONS for both programs as well.  </p>
<p>On this subject, I have tried both programs and I am pleasingly suprised at the printing functions in Lightroom.  I have used Photoshop (7 and then CS2) until now for my printing, but, should I buy Lightroom, I would not have any doubts on which program I would use.</p>
<p>Finally, re. the &#8220;zone&#8221; adjustments, I feel that I would still prefer Photoshop to Capture.  I would use Lightroom for my &#8220;standard&#8221; (i.e. not requiring Lazo type tools) adjustments and conversion from RAW and, for the few cases where I would require &#8220;zone&#8221; adjustments, revert to Photoshop, whose functionalities in this department are miles ahead of Capture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to make better photos &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Adobe Photoshop Lightroom vs. Nikon Capture NX - part II</title>
		<link>http://www.photonovice.net/2007/05/02/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-vs-nikon-capture-nx-enhancements/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>How to make better photos &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Adobe Photoshop Lightroom vs. Nikon Capture NX - part II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2007 20:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonovice.net/?p=106#comment-83</guid>
		<description>[...] Lightroom vs Capture NX part III [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Lightroom vs Capture NX part III [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grafiker @ MÃ¼nchen</title>
		<link>http://www.photonovice.net/2007/05/02/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-vs-nikon-capture-nx-enhancements/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Grafiker @ MÃ¼nchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2007 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonovice.net/?p=106#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Very interesting comparison! Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting comparison! Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.photonovice.net/2007/05/02/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-vs-nikon-capture-nx-enhancements/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 11:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonovice.net/?p=106#comment-65</guid>
		<description>Good comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
