<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What gear to buy as a beginner (if you want to learn photography)?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.photonovice.net/2007/09/26/what-to-buy-as-a-beginner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.photonovice.net/2007/09/26/what-to-buy-as-a-beginner/</link>
	<description>Photography, pictures, tools &#038; techniques</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 15:13:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Billy Joe Jim Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.photonovice.net/2007/09/26/what-to-buy-as-a-beginner/comment-page-1/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Joe Jim Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonovice.net/2007/09/26/what-to-buy-as-a-beginner/#comment-267</guid>
		<description>I got myself a D70s kit, with a cheap Tamron 28-80 and the cheap Nikkor 70-300. Took a few months before I realized that the whole setup is too ... gadgety. I was clicking away, taking thousands of photos, but I was never really in control. Didn&#039;t really &quot;get&quot; what I was doing. I was lucky if 3-4 percent of the snaps were keepers.

Now I put all of that fancy glass and circuit board aside. Instead I&#039;m rocking a Canon AE-1 from the early 80&#039;s, with a 50mm f/1.8 and a 135mm f/2.8 macro lens. Now I&#039;m really forced to work for my photos. I&#039;m gonna stick with this &#039;til I feel that I start getting what I want.

Back to basic, bitches!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got myself a D70s kit, with a cheap Tamron 28-80 and the cheap Nikkor 70-300. Took a few months before I realized that the whole setup is too &#8230; gadgety. I was clicking away, taking thousands of photos, but I was never really in control. Didn&#8217;t really &#8220;get&#8221; what I was doing. I was lucky if 3-4 percent of the snaps were keepers.</p>
<p>Now I put all of that fancy glass and circuit board aside. Instead I&#8217;m rocking a Canon AE-1 from the early 80&#8217;s, with a 50mm f/1.8 and a 135mm f/2.8 macro lens. Now I&#8217;m really forced to work for my photos. I&#8217;m gonna stick with this &#8217;til I feel that I start getting what I want.</p>
<p>Back to basic, bitches!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quirkyalone</title>
		<link>http://www.photonovice.net/2007/09/26/what-to-buy-as-a-beginner/comment-page-1/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>quirkyalone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 12:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonovice.net/2007/09/26/what-to-buy-as-a-beginner/#comment-266</guid>
		<description>I went through the similar experience with canon 17-85. ;-) Anyway, I am not sure if the &quot;start with prime&quot; way is the best one for everyone. For example, I do photojournalism and documentary, and I learned that short-range zoom works best, since prime is not always versatile enough when the scene changes unpredictably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went through the similar experience with canon 17-85. <img src='http://www.photonovice.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' />  Anyway, I am not sure if the &#8220;start with prime&#8221; way is the best one for everyone. For example, I do photojournalism and documentary, and I learned that short-range zoom works best, since prime is not always versatile enough when the scene changes unpredictably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photographyVoter.com</title>
		<link>http://www.photonovice.net/2007/09/26/what-to-buy-as-a-beginner/comment-page-1/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>photographyVoter.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 07:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonovice.net/2007/09/26/what-to-buy-as-a-beginner/#comment-265</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;What gear to buy as a beginner (if you want to learn photography)?...&lt;/strong&gt;

I was wrong when decided on my first DSLR kit. Now I would do it differently. My experience might be beneficial for beginners....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>What gear to buy as a beginner (if you want to learn photography)?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I was wrong when decided on my first DSLR kit. Now I would do it differently.<br />
My experience might be beneficial for beginners&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.photonovice.net/2007/09/26/what-to-buy-as-a-beginner/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:27:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.photonovice.net/2007/09/26/what-to-buy-as-a-beginner/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with the 50mm f/1.8.  I&#039;ve learned more with that lens in the past year (6,000 photos) then any other piece of equipment and at $120 it&#039;s the cheapest lens you&#039;ll buy too.

Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with the 50mm f/1.8.  I&#8217;ve learned more with that lens in the past year (6,000 photos) then any other piece of equipment and at $120 it&#8217;s the cheapest lens you&#8217;ll buy too.</p>
<p>Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
